Testing and Inspection Archives

Welding Guide Subscription Form

Get your FREE guide on what every welding engineer must know

Subscribe to get our latest content by email.

Even with the best techniques, defects can emerge when welding high carbon steel. In this final post, we'll equip you with the knowledge to identify and prevent common welding flaws like cracking, porosity, and undercut. Learn about advanced post-weld heat treatment protocols that enhance durability and explore essential quality control and inspection methods to ensure your high carbon steel welds stand the test of time.

This post provides answers to frequently asked questions regarding the "280 Prequalified Welding Procedures for Stainless Steel" product. It addresses common inquiries from customers about the digital format, permissible uses for CWIs, distinctions between qualified and prequalified procedures, and the rationale behind the product's affordability. Additionally, it clarifies compliance with AWS D1.6, modification flexibility, and how included guides facilitate proper use and customization of these welding procedures.

We're thrilled to announce the release of our new collection: 280 Prequalified Welding Procedure Specifications for Stainless Steel. Developed in accordance with AWS D1.6/D1.6M, this comprehensive package is designed to bring consistency and compliance to welding operations. It includes procedures for GMAW, FCAW-G, GTAW, and SMAW, covering 14 common weld joint configurations and widely used 304, 304L, 316, and 316L stainless steel base metals. This resource is perfect for business owners, fabricators, CWIs, and schools seeking to enhance quality and productivity.

Weld failures in the field often expose deeper systemic issues within a company's welding operations, leading to severe consequences like litigation and financial distress. Many companies mistakenly rely on past success as justification for lacking proper quality control, including welding procedure and welder performance qualifications, and robust inspection processes. When failures occur, the absence of crucial documentation complicates failure analysis and almost guarantees liability. This post emphasizes the critical need for proactive measures like developing welding quality standards, qualifying procedures and welders, and implementing stringent inspection processes to prevent catastrophic failures and ensure long-term structural integrity.

While cracks are often considered the "worst" weld defect, the most dangerous ones are those that go undetected and are put into service. Many common discontinuities like lack of fusion, internal porosity, or even small surface cracks can be missed if quality control standards are inadequate or if inspections are timed improperly. For example, hydrogen-induced cracking can appear up to 48 hours after welding, and incorrect shielding gas for stainless steel, though visually appealing, can lead to costly premature corrosion or sensitization in service. Effective quality control, including qualified procedures, trained welders, and appropriate inspection timing and methods, is essential to prevent these hidden, catastrophic failures.

This blog post concludes a series on developing welding procedures by discussing the crucial topic of qualification. Qualification involves performing both destructive and non-destructive tests to ensure a procedure can produce sound welds, typically following the requirements of specific codes like AWS D1.1. An alternative to this rigorous testing is prequalification, which allows the user to forgo testing if all the requirements of the applicable code's prequalification clause are met. Regardless of the method, the document emphasizes the importance of verifying and documenting the suitability of all developed welding procedures for future reference and quality assurance.

Amperage, voltage, travel speed, and other key variables are crucial for creating a robust welding procedure that ensures sound and high-quality welds.Blog Post Summary This blog post explains the importance of key welding parameters when developing a welding procedure specification. It details how amperage (current) directly influences weld penetration and productivity, while voltage primarily affects bead shape and width. The post also highlights that travel speed is critical, as it impacts weld size, heat input, penetration, and overall weld quality. Additionally, it covers the significance of travel and transverse angles, noting their effects on weld shape and potential for defects. Finally, the post emphasizes the often overlooked but critical role of Contact Tip to Work Distance (CTTWD), explaining how it can drastically alter amperage and potentially lead to a non-compliant or defective weld if not properly controlled.

One of the most common questions in welding is whether qualified or prequalified welding procedures are better. Both serve the same purpose — ensuring consistent, high-quality welds — but they achieve it in different ways. Qualified procedures are proven through destructive and nondestructive testing, while prequalified procedures skip testing if strict code requirements are followed. Prequalified procedures save time and money upfront, but qualified procedures can sometimes reduce weld volume and cut long-term fabrication costs. In this post, we explain both approaches, the requirements for each, and when to use one over the other to get the best results for your shop.

Blogs

Get your FREE guide on what every welding engineer must know

Blogs

Get your FREE guide on what every welding engineer must know