structural welding code Archives

Welding Guide Subscription Form

Get your FREE guide on what every welding engineer must know

Subscribe to get our latest content by email.

Developing a Welding Procedure Specification (WPS) involves much more than selecting amperage and voltage—it requires a structured approach to ensure weld quality and consistency. The process begins with understanding the base metal’s properties and how it responds to heat, followed by selecting the most suitable welding process for quality and productivity. Choosing the correct filler metal and joint design are equally critical, as both influence weld strength, cost, and efficiency. Proper control of preheat and post-weld heat treatment (PWHT) helps manage metallurgical changes that prevent cracking or distortion. Finally, setting appropriate welding variable ranges ensures balance between quality and productivity, resulting in a reliable, code-compliant welding procedure.

ASTM A514 (T-1) is a high-strength, quenched and tempered steel known for its exceptional yield strength and use in heavy-duty structural applications like cranes and bridges. Its martensitic microstructure, while providing strength, makes it susceptible to cracking if not welded correctly, particularly in the heat-affected zone. Successful welding requires careful selection of high-strength, low-hydrogen electrodes, precise adherence to preheat and interpass temperature guidelines, and diligent control of hydrogen sources. Unlike many steels, AWS D1.1 requires qualification by testing for A514, emphasizing the need for rigorous procedures to achieve sound and reliable welds.

We're thrilled to announce the release of our new collection: 280 Prequalified Welding Procedure Specifications for Stainless Steel. Developed in accordance with AWS D1.6/D1.6M, this comprehensive package is designed to bring consistency and compliance to welding operations. It includes procedures for GMAW, FCAW-G, GTAW, and SMAW, covering 14 common weld joint configurations and widely used 304, 304L, 316, and 316L stainless steel base metals. This resource is perfect for business owners, fabricators, CWIs, and schools seeking to enhance quality and productivity.

Weld failures in the field often expose deeper systemic issues within a company's welding operations, leading to severe consequences like litigation and financial distress. Many companies mistakenly rely on past success as justification for lacking proper quality control, including welding procedure and welder performance qualifications, and robust inspection processes. When failures occur, the absence of crucial documentation complicates failure analysis and almost guarantees liability. This post emphasizes the critical need for proactive measures like developing welding quality standards, qualifying procedures and welders, and implementing stringent inspection processes to prevent catastrophic failures and ensure long-term structural integrity.

Thinking about using prequalified welding procedures to save time and money? This post uncovers the eight most common mistakes fabricators make when developing and using AWS D1.1 prequalified welding procedure specifications—and how to avoid them. You’ll learn about code restrictions, filler metal requirements, joint tolerances, and other critical factors that ensure code compliance and weld quality. If you're serious about preventing costly rework and audit issues, this is a must-read.

While cracks are often considered the "worst" weld defect, the most dangerous ones are those that go undetected and are put into service. Many common discontinuities like lack of fusion, internal porosity, or even small surface cracks can be missed if quality control standards are inadequate or if inspections are timed improperly. For example, hydrogen-induced cracking can appear up to 48 hours after welding, and incorrect shielding gas for stainless steel, though visually appealing, can lead to costly premature corrosion or sensitization in service. Effective quality control, including qualified procedures, trained welders, and appropriate inspection timing and methods, is essential to prevent these hidden, catastrophic failures.

This blog post concludes a series on developing welding procedures by discussing the crucial topic of qualification. Qualification involves performing both destructive and non-destructive tests to ensure a procedure can produce sound welds, typically following the requirements of specific codes like AWS D1.1. An alternative to this rigorous testing is prequalification, which allows the user to forgo testing if all the requirements of the applicable code's prequalification clause are met. Regardless of the method, the document emphasizes the importance of verifying and documenting the suitability of all developed welding procedures for future reference and quality assurance.

One of the most common questions in welding is whether qualified or prequalified welding procedures are better. Both serve the same purpose — ensuring consistent, high-quality welds — but they achieve it in different ways. Qualified procedures are proven through destructive and nondestructive testing, while prequalified procedures skip testing if strict code requirements are followed. Prequalified procedures save time and money upfront, but qualified procedures can sometimes reduce weld volume and cut long-term fabrication costs. In this post, we explain both approaches, the requirements for each, and when to use one over the other to get the best results for your shop.

Blogs

Get your FREE guide on what every welding engineer must know

Blogs

Get your FREE guide on what every welding engineer must know