Qualification Archives - Page 2 of 8

Welding Guide Subscription Form

Get your FREE guide on what every welding engineer must know

Subscribe to get our latest content by email.

AWS D1.6, the Structural Welding Code for Stainless Steel, focuses on the structural integrity of welds on stainless steel alloys. It allows for cost-saving prequalified welding procedure specifications (WPSs), similar to AWS D1.1 for carbon steel. Using prequalified WPSs involves adhering to guidelines for welding process, base and filler metals, temperature, and joint type. While advantageous, users must own the code and ensure their applications align with its structural focus, as engineers are responsible for additional requirements like corrosion resistance.

Weld failures in the field often expose deeper systemic issues within a company's welding operations, leading to severe consequences like litigation and financial distress. Many companies mistakenly rely on past success as justification for lacking proper quality control, including welding procedure and welder performance qualifications, and robust inspection processes. When failures occur, the absence of crucial documentation complicates failure analysis and almost guarantees liability. This post emphasizes the critical need for proactive measures like developing welding quality standards, qualifying procedures and welders, and implementing stringent inspection processes to prevent catastrophic failures and ensure long-term structural integrity.

The AWS D1.1 Structural Welding Code for Steel allows fabricators to use prequalified welding procedures (WPSs), saving significant time and money by exempting them from testing. This post outlines an 8-step guide to writing a prequalified WPS, covering selecting approved base metals, weld joints, welding processes, filler metals, shielding gases, and determining preheat, interpass, and post-weld heat treatment. It emphasizes that anyone who understands the code can create these essential documents for quality and productivity.

Amperage, voltage, travel speed, and other key variables are crucial for creating a robust welding procedure that ensures sound and high-quality welds.Blog Post Summary This blog post explains the importance of key welding parameters when developing a welding procedure specification. It details how amperage (current) directly influences weld penetration and productivity, while voltage primarily affects bead shape and width. The post also highlights that travel speed is critical, as it impacts weld size, heat input, penetration, and overall weld quality. Additionally, it covers the significance of travel and transverse angles, noting their effects on weld shape and potential for defects. Finally, the post emphasizes the often overlooked but critical role of Contact Tip to Work Distance (CTTWD), explaining how it can drastically alter amperage and potentially lead to a non-compliant or defective weld if not properly controlled.

Selecting the right filler metal is a critical step in welding procedure development and should never be treated as a default or trivial decision. This article explains why matching strength filler metals are not always the best choice and how undermatching filler metals can improve ductility and reduce cracking, especially in highly restrained or high-strength steel applications. It also explores how service conditions—such as low-temperature performance, corrosion resistance, stress relieving, and wear requirements—directly influence filler metal selection. Real-world examples illustrate why tensile strength alone is insufficient when evaluating filler metals for production welding. Understanding these factors allows welding engineers and practitioners to make informed, economical decisions that improve long-term weld performance.

Selecting the right welding process is a foundational step in developing a welding procedure that balances quality, productivity, and cost. This article explains why the highest deposition rate process is not always the best choice and how real-world constraints—such as available equipment, joint type, welding position, environment, and welder skill—shape process selection. It also examines productivity in terms of deposition rate, cleanup requirements, and electrode efficiency, rather than speed alone. By introducing return on investment as a decision factor, the article highlights when investing in new welding equipment may be justified. Understanding these considerations helps ensure the selected welding process supports both production goals and long-term weld quality.

One of the most common questions in welding is whether qualified or prequalified welding procedures are better. Both serve the same purpose — ensuring consistent, high-quality welds — but they achieve it in different ways. Qualified procedures are proven through destructive and nondestructive testing, while prequalified procedures skip testing if strict code requirements are followed. Prequalified procedures save time and money upfront, but qualified procedures can sometimes reduce weld volume and cut long-term fabrication costs. In this post, we explain both approaches, the requirements for each, and when to use one over the other to get the best results for your shop.

Blogs

Get your FREE guide on what every welding engineer must know

Blogs

Get your FREE guide on what every welding engineer must know